Project Sentinel · Real‑time reporting archive, curated polls, public education

Counter antisemitism with data, education, and curated, poll‑based sentiment — not DMs.

Sentinel publishes reviewed incident data, attaches curated response options to public posts, and captures real‑time sentiment via one‑tap polls. No messaging between users. Volunteers help review content before it goes live.

Updated: 2025-11-01 · v1.4 mockup

📊
Live demo

Poll‑based Sentiment

We never open user‑to‑user messaging. Instead, each monitored post gets a curated micro‑poll that aggregates public sentiment.

ℹ️This is a front‑end demo only — counts reset on refresh.
🗳️Total votes: 0
📝

Curated by Sentinel editors. Options vary per post and avoid dog‑whistles or brigading.

About Us

Expose hate, not users

Sentinel is a mobile‑first platform built to help people document and analyze antisemitic, antizionist, and anti‑Israel incidents—whether witnessed online or in the real world. Registered users can submit posts describing what they have seen, witnessed, or experienced, attaching media or contextual details for moderator review.

To protect users and maintain civility, Sentinel does not allow comments or direct replies. Instead, every verified report is published with a small set of pre‑curated "choices" that viewers can select to express how they interpret the event. These responses feed into a live Sentiment Tracker (Barometer)—a continuously updated visualization of collective perception, showing how the community interprets reported content without opening the door to harassment or hostility.

Every submission is reviewed before publication, anonymized as needed, and presented in a structured format that invites reflection rather than argument.

How it works

Three pillars: Reporting · Education · Review

🛰️

1) Report

Reports are submitted in‑app only, triaged, normalized, and queued for review before public release. The website is informational.

  • • Digital & physical incident types
  • • Personal experiences (first‑person) supported
  • • Evidence upload & redaction in app
📚

2) Educate

Curated videos, articles, primers, and "quick‑clips" that explain common tropes, slogans, and historical context — vetted for accuracy.

  • • Learn to spot antisemitic tropes
  • • Understand anti‑Zionist narratives
  • • Submit content suggestions
🛡️

3) Review

Admins and cleared volunteers review reports and educational content for safety, veracity, and clarity before publication.

  • • No DMs or chat between users
  • • Poll‑only sentiment collection
  • • Gratification via contribution badges
Platform principles

No Messaging · Poll‑Only Sentiment · Privacy‑first

Why no messaging?

To avoid harassment and dog‑piling, Sentinel removes user‑to‑user messaging. Interaction is limited to structured inputs: reports (in‑app), flags, and single‑tap poll responses.

This also simplifies moderation and protects targets of abuse.

Data & privacy

Minimal data collection. Sensitive details are optional and never public without explicit consent. Aggregated analytics only.

  • • Pseudonymous reporting supported (in‑app)
  • • Evidence redaction workflow
  • • Clear retention/appeal policies
Education library

Learn, share, and submit

Spot the trope

Short explainers on common antisemitic motifs and how to respond constructively.

View sample ›
Context packs

Downloadable one‑pagers with citations that unpack viral claims with history and law.

View sample ›
Submit content

Educators and commentators can propose videos/articles for inclusion. All items are reviewed.

Contact admins ›
Admin · Volunteers

Review queue sign‑in

Access to the review console is app‑based.

Volunteer & admin onboarding is handled in‑app. Use the mobile app to request access.

Open App

Review standards

  • • Safety first: remove doxxing & threats
  • • Accuracy & context over virality
  • • Neutral labels; avoid partisan framing
  • • Publish with curated response options
  • • Gratification via contribution badges
Trust & safety

Privacy, retention, and appeals

Minimal data

We only collect what's needed to vet reports and improve the platform. Optional contact for follow‑up.

Retention

Evidence is retained only as long as necessary for verification, redaction, and appeals.

Appeals

Flag any item for review with a reason. A separate team resolves escalations within defined SLAs.